Kissinger waarschuwt Poetin:
‘Pas op voor NWO’..?!
2016 © WantToKnow.nl/be
x
Henry Kissinger ontmoette een paar dagen geleden de Russische president Vladimir Poetin in Moskou. Hij kwam met een waarschuwing: ‘Werk mee met westerse de plannen rondom de New World Order’..! Volgens Kissinger, dienen Rusland en de VS een samenwerking te ontwikkelen, omdat elk van hen, als supermacht, een belangrijke rol te speelt in het vormgeven van deze ‘nieuwe wereld orde’ voor de toekomst.. En wanneer deze supermachten samenwerken, een zekere, gecoördineerde benadering ontstaat van de creatie van deze NWO..
Op 20 januari arriveerde Kissinger in Moskou om Poetin een ultimatum te overhandigen, in de vorm van een ‘vriendelijk advies’. Dit advies bestond erin, dat Kissinger het advies overbracht aan Poetin, dat hij zich niet meer verkiesbaar moet gaan stellen voor nog een ambtsperiode als president of minister-president. “Anders zal de VS de macht van de Russen aanzienlijk inperken, verpulveren zelfs.”.
Een belangrijke gast..
Het is alweer 4 jaar geleden dat de Russische president Vladimir Poetin de voormalige minister van Buitenlandse Zaken ontving in zijn residentie in Novo-Ogaryovo. net als hun vorige ontmoeting werd niet bekend gemaakt wat er precies werd besproken en gezegd. Het is duidelijk dat deze Henry Kissinger zaken kwam bespreken die niet overgelaten kunnen worden aan de vice-minister van Buitenlandse Zaken, Victoria Nuland, niet aan John Kerry, en zelfs niet aan Barack Obama..
De bezoeken van Henry Kissinger aan Moskou waren echter wel in frequentere vorm. Hij was er 2x in 2013 (voor- en najaar), waarschijnlijk om Rusland te overtuigen/vertellen dat het zich diende terug te trekken uit Oekraïne..! Het is de mening van Kissinger en de cirkels waarin Kissinger plaats heeft (de clan van de Rockefellers), die vaak wordt genegeerd door de politieke leiding in de VS. Dit heeft tot veel geopolitieke nederlagen geleid voor Washington. Het is Kissinger die maar bleef hameren op de sleutel die de Amerikaanse dominantie in de wereld is: de ontregeling van EurAzië. De grootste nederlaag in dit opzicht is de deal die Poetin sloot met de Chinese leiders over o.a. de levering van olie in NIET US$’s…
Vooral de samenwerking, voor de revolutie in Oekraïne, met Berlijn, was voor de Amerikanen de laatste val vanuit hun hegemonie in Europa, en luidde de snelle neerval van de politieke macht van de VS in Europa in.
But these powers soon will be able to occupy the White House, and it will be time to talk about the future, the future in which Russia and the United States have to live in.
“New world” by Kissinger
Immediately upon returning to the States, Henry Kissinger wrote a column for the magazine The National Interest, in which he outlined his vision for the future of the world. The most significant points being:
Firstly, the relationship between the U.S. and Russia is currently probably even worse than they were before the end of the cold war. Experts in both countries believe that Moscow and Washington have entered a new phase of confrontation and are unlikely to be able to cooperate effectively on issues of world order. Secondly, he pointed out that Russia and the U.S. should cooperate. According to him, the country needs to develop a concept of partnership, which will set out the roles each country will play in shaping the new world order and the concept of a coordinated approach to it.
Kissinger noted that the U.S. and Russia should cooperate not only among themselves but also with other states. Instability in the world today is unprecedented. Threats arise because of the destruction of state power and the growing number of uncontrolled territories. Such problems cannot be solved by one country, so the United States must continually cooperate with Russia and other world powers.
Henry Kissinger did not ignore Ukraine, which, in his opinion should become a bridge between Russia and the West, and not an outpost of one of the parties. Also the diplomat stressed that if the U.S. and Russia were to work together in Syria, along with other major powers, they will be able to create a model for a peaceful settlement of the conflict, not only in the Middle East, but possibly in other areas.
Over the past few years, Washington and Moscow cooperated only sporadically, but great progress was made, which is not surprising: discussions were held outside the agreed strategic format. Therefore, Kissinger stated the need to perceive Russia as an integral element of any new global equilibrium, not only as a threat to the United States.
The forgotten superpower
Let us try to understand the diplomatic lexicon of politics and look at the problem from a great height. How does the U.S (Henry Kissinger) approach problem-solving at the highest, that is, strategic level?
This catches the eye. No one in the States (even Kissinger) doubts that the future of the world, at any point, must be addressed with Russia and possibly with even some major countries.
Has the rhetoric changed in the last four years? It has long forgotten the concept of a singular global hegemon, which for last 20 years was the USA. Also forgotten are world governments (American), and the strongest army with the most modern weapons.
It should be understood that Russia’s “right to decide” was not due to the fact that the United States was flexible, but because the events of recent years and the efforts of the leadership of the Russian Federation has forced Washington to reconsider their opinions and make concessions.
An important marker is the desire of the former “masters of the world” to share the burden of responsibility for Ukraine with Moscow, and return it to its dominant period, when this area was once the bridge between Europe and Russia. In fact, the U.S. is ready to retreat and lose half of its influence, until they lose everything.
It’s the same thing in Syria. Six months ago it seemed that the days of the Assad regime were numbered, and the entire Middle East would remain not only as eternal pain for Europe and Russia, but also in full orbit of the political power of the United States. Six months later and there has been enormous change. An outpost of the U.S – Saudi Arabia – is on the verge of defeat. Turkey found itself in the situation of Ukraine two years ago, and may simply fall apart. At the same time, Russia and Iran are increasing their presence and influence by leaps and bounds in the Middle East, threatening in the medium term to squeeze the U.S. out of the strategic region.
But because of the mouth of Henry Kissinger, Vladimir Putin has apparently also heard the suggestion to “divide” the region. And this (according to the American political elite) must become a “model” for similar agreements in other parts of Eurasia.
The bridge through Alaska
What did the President of Russia say? I think he said he would think about it for another four years. Through which he will be able to offer Henry Kissinger, or someone else, to make Alaska a “bridge” between Russia and America, and will promise to consider also the interests of Washington and other major powers in Europe.
But if they are not satisfied with the American political elite, they will have to wait for the next offer, which is expected in four years. But it seems to me that it will be even worse for them.
